As documented in Zuboff's own book, the Pokemon Go video Last Database game. What do they know about us? What do you know about me that I don't know myself? The systematization of information and the analysis of behavioral patterns lead to an excessive Last Database knowledge of some human behaviors, a knowledge that generates an epistemic inequality between what we know about Last Database ourselves and what they know about us.
This inequality can be replicated at the macroeconomic level. Indeed, digital services know the needs, movements, tastes, customs and many other things of the citizens of a country.
All this information could be used to Last Database plan public policies and design artificial intelligence systems that improve public services and make the State more efficient. In a world of big data , there doesn't seem to be enough data to improve states. It was already possible to see Last Database how Google shared information on the mobility of people during the covid-19 pandemic, indicating the rate of activity and circulation of the Last Database countries. Information like that can be extremely valuable to control the pandemic in a territory, and it is in the hands of corporations.
Epistemic inequality is increasing, and Last Database artificial intelligence systems contribute to it by drawing conclusions about our lives, tastes and customs that lead us to think about constant surveillance and what we will face in the future if we do not start an intelligence development strategy national contrivance.
Creative processes and the right to Last Database be
Artificial intelligence intervenes more and more in our daily activities: translations, inquiries, writing a simple email, job search, walking the streets, etc. It goes unnoticed, we have naturalized it. But the truth is that many of the systems that use it observe our behaviors and, in Last Database many cases, seek to standardize them. For example, injustices committed by teacher evaluation systems in the US are well documented.